The Immigration Hub conducts data-driven research to understand public sentiment on immigration, develops educational messaging to inform the public about immigration issues, and explores innovative approaches to foster greater understanding through cutting-edge communication strategies.
People fleeing persecution, who followed every step of the process, are now stuck in legal limbo, unable to take the final step toward permanent status. Their rights, their futures—put on hold indefinitely, or worse, revoked entirely.
Read the latest on Substack
The election of Donald Trump spurred a renaissance of new thinkers and innovators who decided to challenge conventional wisdom on how we talk about immigration, race and the economy to voters in the middle and on the margins. A year-long collaboration between the Immigration Hub and BlueLabs Analytics generated a new set of profiles of the American electorate who will be crucial to winning the political and cultural debate on immigration. These profiles provide a first of its kind, data-driven blueprint to match and reach key voters where they are, with the right message and creative content.
During the October tracking period, there were 4,768 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 18,075,339,377 people (including new and repeat views) worth an estimated 495,293,445 in publicity. There were 68,892 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 850,815,091 people.
During the September tracking period, there were 4,103 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 15,009,835,443 people (including new and repeat views) worth an estimated $462,611,597 in publicity. There were 67,672 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 881,182,229 people.
During the August tracking period, there were 3,551 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 8,669,133,812 people worth an estimated $228,543,237 in publicity. There were 76,737 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 923,535,460 people.
During the July tracking period, there were 3,897 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 8,063,840,793 people worth an estimated $201,953,468 in publicity. There were 82,302 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 1,261,758,139 people.
During the June tracking period, there were 3,410 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 6,841,057,567 people worth an estimated $160,618,086 in publicity. There were 69,233 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 981,910,564 people.
During the May tracking period, there were 6,896 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 17,015,783,522 people worth an estimated $477,320,364 dollars in publicity. There were 50,011 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 752,080,140 people.
During the April 1st-30th tracking period, there were 3,695 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 8,622,884,258 people worth an estimated $247,516,068 million dollars in publicity.
During the March 1-31st tracking period, there were 4,427 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 11.8 million people worth an estimated $357 million dollars in publicity. There were 73,497 mentions on Twitter to an audience of 1,039,829,535 million people.
During the January 1- February 8 tracking period, there were 7,474 negative immigration mentions across right-wing media outlets to an estimated audience of over 59 million people and over 267,505 Twitter mentions.
